Skip to Main Content
prowl (
pffft
) wrote
2021-11-12 01:13 pm (UTC)
no subject
[
HMM!!
]
The time signature is fairly standard, but there is some intriguing improvisation. This does make for good context, even if 2,000 years is not much for us. I will add it to my database.
(
279 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
(will be screened)
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
The time signature is fairly standard, but there is some intriguing improvisation. This does make for good context, even if 2,000 years is not much for us. I will add it to my database.